ABSTRACT
Background: COVID-19 is characterized by a dysregulated inflammatory response associated with disease severity, poor prognosis and death. The aim of this study was to describe the real-life use of high-dose anakinra (ANK, a recombinant IL-1 receptor antagonist) among patients with COVID-19 who received remdesivir (REM). Methods: Cohort study including 277 patients with COVID-19 hospitalized at IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital between September 1st,2020 and February 28th, 2021;58 patients were treated with REM+ANK and 219 patients with REM only. ANK was administered intravenously at a dose of 5mg/kg every 12 hours. Patients were treated according to available local and international guidelines;corticosteroids and anticoagulation were administered when not contraindicated. Results are described by median (IQR) or frequency (%);P-values (P) were calculated by chi-square or Fishers' exact test and Wilcoxon rank-sum test, as appropriate. Survival estimates at 28 days were calculated using Kaplan-Meier curves. Results: At hospital admission (Table 1), patients treated with REM+ANK tended to be older [69 years (57-77) vs 62 years (53-75), P=0.06], had a significant lower PaO2/FiO2 [135 (91-220) vs 246 (172-299), P=0.0001], higher aspartate aminotransferase [51U/L (34-74) vs 40U/L (30-53), P=0.001], lactate dehydrogenase [405U/L (296-496) vs 334U/L (279-419), P=0.008], D-dimer [0.86mcg/mL (0.48-1.57) vs 0.67mcg/mL (0.39-1.17), P=0.048], ferritin [1167ng/mL (804-1983) vs 683ng/mL (391-1153), P<0.0001] and C-reactive protein [82mg/L (38-136) vs 58 mg/L (27-96), P=0.004), and were more frequently admitted to the Intensive Care Unit within the first 48 hours [3 (1.1%) vs 0, P=0.007). REM and ANK were started early within a median of 0 (0-2) and 1.5 days (0-3) since hospitalization, respectively. The Kaplan-Meier estimate of mortality at 28 days was 17.2% (95%CI 8.8-32.1%) in the REM+ANK group (8 deaths) and 21.4% (95%CI 13.3-33.3%) in the REM group (18 deaths;log-rank test P=0.797). Median time to death was 14 days (9-29) in the REM+ANK group vs 19 days (12-27) in the REM group (P=0.523). Conclusion: Real-life use of high-dose ANK in COVID-19 patients treated with REM was reserved for subjects with severe respiratory failure and a more pronounced inflammatory status. Nevertheless, mortality at 28 days was not significantly different among patients treated with or without ANK. Further analyses are warranted to verify the impact of ANK addition to REM in patients with a hyperinflammatory profile.
ABSTRACT
Introduction & Objectives: After the early and dramatic induction of inflammatory cytokines, IL-6 emerged to be associated with severe outcomes in patients with COVID-19. Likewise, high IL-10 plasma levels have been reported, and central hypogonadism has been recently observed in male patients with severe clinical outcomes (i.e., Intensive Care Unit (ICU) admission or death) of COVID-19. We aimed to investigate the role of IL-10 over the pathophysiology of COVID-19 and its relationship with hypogonadism in males. Materials & Methods: Plasma from 281 voluntary healthy males (HC) and 258 laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 males (i.e., asymptomatic (n=24);symptomatic (n=155);ICU patients (n=48);and, deceased (n=31)) was collected to measure levels of total testosterone (TT), IL-10 and the nonclassical MHC class I HLA-G (HLA-G) molecule - associated to IL-10 and involved in immune escape after viral infection - by specific enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Results: An inverse correlation between TT and IL-10 levels was identified, with TT levels progressively decreasing from HC (median (IQR) 10.4 (8.1-13.4) nmol/L) to asymptomatic COVID-19 (3.9 (3.1-5.3) nmol/L), to symptomatic COVID-19 (3.0 (1.8-5.7) nmol/L), ICU (1.0 (0.5-1.8) nml/L) and deceased (0.7 (0.3-2.3) nmol/L) patients, respectively (p<0.0001). Conversely, IL-10 levels progressively decreased from deceased COVID-19 patients (11.3 (4.5-37.7) pg/ml), to ICU (8.0 (2.6-16.7) pg/mL), symptomatic (6.0 (3.0-10.9) pg/mL), asymptomatic COVID-19 patients (6.0 (1.6-6.0) pg/mL), and HC (3.0 (1.3-3.0) pg/mL), respectively (p<0.0001). Similarly, HLA-G levels, progressively increased from HC to COVID-19 patients with most severe clinical outcomes. Conclusions: These data indicate that circulating TT is inversely associated to both IL-10 and HLA-G levels in men with COVID-19, where lower TT and higher IL-10 levels are associated with the most severe clinical outcomes. Further investigations are required to better define whether TT and IL-10 might be early effective biomarkers of clinical severity in males with COVID-19 and to exploit if TT is involved in promoting IL-10 and HLA-G induction.
ABSTRACT
Introduction & Objectives: In patients with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection (COVID-19) reasons for sex disparity in disease severity are still unclear and circulating androgens could play a role. We investigated circulating sex steroids levels in a cohort of symptomatic patients with COVID-19 compared to a cohort of healthy men. Materials & Methods: Data of 286 patients with COVID-19 admitted to a single academic centre were compared to 305 voluntaryhealthy blood donors. Patients were further categorized according to disease severity as: Group 1: mildly symptomatic and discharge home;Group 2: admitted in the internal medicine unit;Group 3: admitted to intensive care unit (ICU);and, Group 4: deceased because of COVID-19. Healthy controls were subdivided in SARS-CoV-2 negative and asymptomatic unaware SARS-CoV-2 positive. Health-related comorbidities were scored with the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI). Moreover, a validated composite risk score (Liang et al, 2020) was calculated to estimate the risk of developing critical illness in men with COVID-19. Hypogonadism was defined as a total testosterone (TT) level < 9.2 nmol/l. Logistic regression analysis tested the association between TT level and the risk of death due to COVID-19. Results: Overall, men with COVID-19 showed a higher burden of comorbidities than healthy controls and asymptomatic positive controls (CCI³2 in 66/286 (24%) vs. 0/281 (0%) vs. 0/24 (0%);p<0.0001). TT levels were significantly lower in patients with COVID-19 vs. asymptomatic vs. healthy controls (mean (IQR) 2.5 (1-4.7) nmol/L) vs. 11.8 (8.4-14.4) vs. 10.4 (8.1-13.4) nmol/L, respectively;p<0.0001). Of all, hypogonadism was observed in 257 (89.8%) patients, 9 (33%) asymptomatic and 42 (14.9%) healthy controls at hospital admission (p<0.0001). In as many as 243 (85%) patients, hypogonadism was secondary. Of patients, in Group 1 were 24 (4.5%), in Group 2: 155 (29%), in Group 3: 48 (8.9%), and in Group 4: 31 (5.8%). Both Group 3 and 4 patients had significantly lower TT (1.0 (0.5,1.8) and 0.7 (0.3,2.3) nmol/L, respectively) compared to Group 2 (3.0 (1.8,5.7)) and Group 1 (3.9 (3.1,5.3) nmol/L) patients (p<0.0001). At logistic regression, a lower TT level was associated with a higher risk of death (OR: 0.66;95%CI 0.45, 0.98) after accounting for the critical illness score. Of note, the lower the TT, the higher the risk of death for the same Critical-Ill COVID-19 score (Figure 1).(Figure Presented) Conclusions: We unveiled an independent association between SARS-CoV-2 infection status and hypogonadism already at hospital admission, with lower testosterone levels predicting the most severe clinical outcomes.
ABSTRACT
Background. Evidence regarding the impact of remdesivir (RDV) on SARSCoV-2 viral clearance (VC) is scarce. Aim of this study was to compare VC timing in COVID-19 patients who received RDV with those who did not. Methods. Matched-cohort study conducted (25 February 2020-15 April 2021) at the IRCSS San Raffaele, Milan, Italy. The study enrolled hospitalized patients with pneumonia and a SARS-CoV-2 positive nasopharyngeal swab (NPS) at admission and at least one NPS during follow-up. Follow-up started at hospital admission and ended at the date of the first negative NPS (within 30 days after discharge). Patients who received RDV (cases) and patients who did not (controls) were matched based on age (±5 years), sex and PaO2/FiO2 (P/F;±10 mmHg) values at admission. NPS were analyzed with RT-PCR. Results described as median (IQR) or frequency (%). Time to VC was estimated with Kaplan-Meier curve and compared with log-rank test. Results. 648 patients were enrolled: 216 cases and 432 controls. Patients' characteristics at admission are reported in Table 1. VC was observed in 490 patients (75.6%) in a median time of 25 (16-34) days. Overall, time to VC was similar in patients receiving or not receiving remdesivir (p=0.519). However, time to VC was different when considering both the use of RDV (yes vs no) and age (≤ or > 63 years), as shown in Figure 1A. A significant finding was also observed considering the use of RDV and P/F values at admission (≤ or > 200 mmHg), as reported in Figure 1B. Among the 490 patients who reached VC during follow-up, overall time to VC was similar in patients receiving or not receiving RDV (p=0.075;Figure 2A);however, RDV use was associated with a higher probability of VC in the subgroup of patients with P/F admission values ≤ 200mmHg (p=0.035;Figure 2B), in the age group 55-65 years (p=0.025;Figure 2C) and in patients with comorbidities (p=0.028). Time to viral clearance among the 490 patients who reached VC during follow-up. Panel A: time to VC according to RDV use. Panel B: time to VC according to RDV and P/F ratio value at admission. Panel C: time to VC according to RDV in the age group 55-65 years. Conclusion. Time to viral clearance was similar in patients receiving or not receiving remdesivir;however the use of RDV was associated with a benefit on time to viral clearance in younger patients and in those with a P/F ratio at admission ≤200 mmHg.
ABSTRACT
Background: The clinical spectrum of COVID-19 ranges from pauci-symptomatic forms to severe disease characterized by respiratory failure requiring mechanical ventilation and intensive care unit (ICU) management, as well as multisystem involvement characterized by sepsis, organ dysfunction and death. Treatment of COVID-19 is not standardized, and respiratory failure from ARDS is the leading cause of mortality;in-hospital mortality at 28-days in our tertiary care center in Lombardia, northern Italy was 23% during the first wave in 2020(Ciceri et al. 2020). Endothelial damage and thrombo-inflammation have been identified as common to both COVID-19 pathophysiology and veno-occlusive disease (VOD/SOS). Defibrotide (DF) has endothelial-protective properties, with pro-fibrinolytic, anti-thrombotic, anti-ischemic, anti-inflammatory, and anti-adhesive activity, but no significant systemic anticoagulant effects and is approved for the treatment of severe VOD/SOS. Aim: A prospective, multicenter, phase II, single-arm, open label trial (DEFI-VID19, NCT04335201) was conducted in patients (pts) with COVID-19 ARDS to evaluate the efficacy of DF in addition to best available therapy per institutional guidelines. The primary endpoint was respiratory-failure rate (RFR) defined as progression of respiratory failure, i.e. severe gas transfer deficit (PaO2/FiO2<200 mmHg), need of ICU or death at day+14 from treatment start. Secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS) at 28 days, duration of hospitalization and safety. A sample size of 50 pts was calculated to detect an absolute reduction of 20% in RFR at day+14, assuming a failure rate in non-treated pts of 70% (alpha=5%, power=90%, two-sided test). Pts received DF intravenously at 6.25 mg/kg/dose by 2-hour infusion repeated every 6 hours. Expected treatment duration was 14 days, with earlier discontinuation if clinical improvement occurred. LMWH at prophylactic dose was allowed. Approval was provided by the National IRB for COVID-19 trials at Institute Spallanzani (Rome) and by the Italian Agency for Drug (AIFA). All patients provided written informed consent. Results: Overall, 52 pts were enrolled from September 2020 to April 2021;48 were evaluated for efficacy and safety;4 pts were excluded due to screen failure (n=2) or withdrawal of informed consent at day 2 after defibrotide was initiated (n=2). Median age was 60.5 years (range 53-71);35 pts (73%) were male and 65% had comorbidities, with high blood pressure, obesity and COPD most common. Two pts had pre-existing diagnoses of non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Median time from onset of COVID-19 symptoms and from Sars-COV2 PCR by nasal swab to enrollment were 8 (range 7-10) and 3 days (range 1-6), respectively. All pts were hospitalized and scale 5 of 8-category ordinal scale by WHO criteria, requiring noninvasive ventilation with CPAP or high-flow oxygen, with a median P/F ratio of 211 (range 134-275) mmHg. At treatment start, the median and (range) lymphocyte counts, LDH, CRP, ferritin, D-dimer and IL-6 were 0.7 (0.5-0.9) x 10e9/L;404 (291-491) U/L;49 (22-97) mg/L;823 (363-1088) ng/ml;0.44 (0.28-1.29) µg/mL and 20 (11-32), respectively. Median treatment duration was 8.5 days (range 6-11). Overall, 13/48 pts (27%) discontinued the treatment due to clinical worsening and/or need of further therapies: 9 pts experienced progressive respiratory failure and 6 of those were transferred to ICU for IOT (one pt required ECMO), and 4 required full anticoagulation due to pulmonary embolism (n=1), ischemic stroke (n=1), and femoral deep venous thrombosis (n=2). All pts who completed the treatment 35/48 (73%) were discharged with no need of oxygen support. Overall, 14 SAEs have been reported in a median time of 6 days (range 2-10): all unrelated to DF. No pts experienced hemorrhagic events. The incidence of RFR at day 14 was 25 (+/- 6)%, and at day 28, 27 (+/- 6) %. Probability of OS at day 28 was 89 (+/-4) %, at day 60 83 (+/- 5)%. Overall, 8 pts died from COVID-19 -related complications. No pts required re-admission after hospital discha ge (median 14 days) or died after discharge. Conclusion: Treatment with DF in pts with grade 5 WHO COVID 19 ARDS does not induce bleeding, and is associated with rapid restoration of respiratory function (73% of pts). Notably, no oxygen support was needed at discharge and a 1-month OS rate of 89% was observed, which is higher than historical controls (77%) treated in the same setting. Disclosures: Richardson: Takeda: Consultancy, Research Funding;AbbVie: Consultancy;Karyopharm: Consultancy, Research Funding;AstraZeneca: Consultancy;Oncopeptides: Consultancy, Research Funding;Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Research Funding;Protocol Intelligence: Consultancy;Secura Bio: Consultancy;Regeneron: Consultancy;Celgene/BMS: Consultancy, Research Funding;GlaxoSmithKline: Consultancy;Janssen: Consultancy;Sanofi: Consultancy. Ciceri: IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele: Current Employment. Carlo-Stella: Incyte: Honoraria;Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding;Sanofi: Consultancy, Research Funding;AstraZeneca: Honoraria;Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees;ADC Therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding;Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees;Janssen Oncology: Honoraria;Karyopharm Therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.
ABSTRACT
Background The ongoing Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, caused by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), is having an enormous impact on society worldwide and is especially posing a threat to health in vulnerable patients, such as patients with immune deficiencies. It is expected that patients who received Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-cell (CAR T-cell) therapy for hematologic malignancies are at risk for poor outcomes after COVID-19 due to their severely immunocompromised state caused by prior cumulative immunochemotherapy, on-target/off-tumor B-cell depletion, hypogammaglobulinemia and ongoing cytopenias. Current data are limited to small case series and case reports. This study describes the clinical characteristics and outcomes of CAR T-cell therapy recipients after developing COVID-19 in the largest cohort to date. Methods In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT) developed a special COVID-19 report form to capture data from all patients with COVID-19 after treatment with CAR T-cell therapy for hematologic malignancies. Only PCR positive SARS-CoV-2 diagnosed patients before June 1 st, 2021 were included. The aim of this study was to describe the clinical course after COVID-19 diagnosis and evaluate overall survival. Overall survival probabilities were calculated using the Kaplan Meier method. Factors associated with mortality after COVID-19 diagnosis were examined using a Cox proportional hazard model. Results A total of 57 patients from 11 countries were reported to the EBMT. One patient with incomplete data at diagnosis and without any follow up information had to be excluded from the analysis. The median age of these 56 patients was 57.7 years (min-max 5.2 - 72.8) including 55 adults and one child. Of these patients, 32 were male. CAR T-cell therapy was given to 46 patients with B-cell-non-Hodgkin lymphoma, 7 patients with B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia, and 3 patients with multiple myeloma. The median time from CAR T-cell infusion to COVID-19 diagnosis was 7.4 months (min-max 0.03 - 25.3). At the time of COVID-19 diagnosis, 62.5% of patients were in complete remission, 12.5% of patients had a partial response and 25% of patients had relapsed/refractory disease. Forty-five patients (80%) were admitted to hospital (median 26,5 days, min-max 3-171) due to COVID-19. Of the admitted patients, 24 (53%) needed oxygen support. Twenty-two (49%) patients were admitted to the intensive care unit (median 14 days, min - max 2-65) and 16 (73%) of these patients received invasive ventilation. At the time of analysis, 25 of the 56 patients had died (44.6%), most (23/25) due to COVID-19, resulting in a COVID-19 attributable mortality rate of 41%. The Kaplan-Meier estimate of overall survival is shown in Figure 1. The median follow-up from COVID-19 diagnosis was 20.9 weeks. In 1 of the 32 alive patients there was no resolution of COVID-19 at the time of analysis. In multivariate analysis, older age (hazard ratio (HR) 1.50, 95% CI 1.11-2.03, p=0.009) and comorbidities (HR 2.56, 95% CI 1.05-6.23, p=0.001) had a negative impact on overall survival. Better performance status at time of admission (HR 0.72, 95% CI 0.59-0.88, p=0.038) had a positive impact on overall survival. Sex, time from CAR T-cell therapy to COVID-19 diagnosis, disease remission status and the occurrence of neurotoxicity or cytokine release syndrome after CAR T-cell infusion did not have a significant effect on overall survival in the multivariate analysis. Conclusion Patients with COVID-19 after B-cell-targeted CAR T-cell therapy have a very poor outcome. As it remains uncertain whether currently applied vaccination strategies against SARS-CoV-2 are effective after CAR T-cell therapy, vaccination of health-care personnel and family members in combination with protective measures against viral exposure are likely to play the most important role in protecting this vulnerable group of patients. Better treatment strategies are urgently needed. [Formula present d] Disclosures: Ljungman: OctaPharma: Other: DSMB;Enanta: Other: DSMB;Janssen: Other: Investigator;Takeda: Consultancy, Other: Endpoint committee, speaker;AiCuris: Consultancy;Merck: Other: Investigator, speaker. De La Camara: IQONE: Consultancy;Roche: Consultancy. Ortiz-Maldonado: Kite, Novartis, BMS, Janssen: Honoraria. Barba: Novartis: Honoraria;Gilead: Honoraria;BMS: Honoraria;Amgen: Honoraria;Pfizer: Honoraria. Kwon: Novartis, Celgene, Gilead, Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria. Sesques: Novartis: Honoraria;Chugai: Honoraria;Kite, a Gilead Company: Honoraria. Bachy: Kite, a Gilead Company: Honoraria;Novartis: Honoraria;Daiishi: Research Funding;Roche: Consultancy;Takeda: Consultancy;Incyte: Consultancy. Di Blasi: Kite, a Gilead Company: Consultancy, Honoraria;Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria;Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria. Thieblemont: Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees;Takeda: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees;Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel, Accommodations, Expenses;Bristol Myers Squibb/Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel, Accommodations, Expenses;Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel, Accommodations, Expenses, Research Funding;Gilead Sciences: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel, Accommodations, Expenses;Kyte: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel, Accommodations, Expenses;Incyte: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees;Abbvie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel, Accommodations, Expenses;Cellectis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel, Accommodations, Expenses;Hospira: Research Funding;Bayer: Honoraria;Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel, Accommodations, Expenses. Mutsaers: BMS: Consultancy;AstraZeneca: Research Funding. Nicholson: Kite, a Gilead Company: Other: Conference fees, Speakers Bureau;Novartis: Consultancy, Other: Conference fees;BMS/Celgene: Consultancy;Pfizer: Consultancy. Martínez-López: Janssen, BMS, Novartis, Incyte, Roche, GSK, Pfizer: Consultancy;Roche, Novartis, Incyte, Astellas, BMS: Research Funding. Ribera: NOVARTIS: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau;TAKEDA: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau;ARIAD: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau;SHIRE: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau;AMGEN: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau;Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Sanderson: Kite, a Gilead Company: Honoraria;Novartis: Honoraria. Bloor: Kite, a Gilead Company: Honoraria;Novartis: Honoraria. Ciceri: IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele: Current Employment. Ayuk: Novartis: Honoraria;Janssen: Honoraria;Takeda: Honoraria;Mallinckrodt/Therakos: Honoraria, Research Funding;Gilead: Honoraria;Miltenyi Biomedicine: Honoraria;Celgene/BMS: Honoraria. Kröger: Novartis: Research Funding;Riemser: Honoraria, Research Funding;Sanofi: Honoraria;Neovii: Honoraria, Research Funding;Jazz: Honoraria, Research Funding;Gilead/Kite: Honoraria;Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding;AOP Pharma: Honoraria. Kersten: Celgene: Research Funding;Miltenyi Biotec: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel support;Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel support, Research Funding;BMS/Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria;Takeda: Research Funding;Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel support;Kite, a Gilead Company: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel support, Research Funding. Mielke: DNA Prime SA: Speakers Bureau;Im unicum: Other: Data safety monitoring board;Novartis: Speakers Bureau;Miltenyi: Other: Data safety monitoring board;Gilead/KITE: Other: Travel support, Expert panel;Celgene/BMS: Speakers Bureau.
ABSTRACT
Objective: Describe characteristics, daily care and outcomes of patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Design: Case series of 73 patients. Setting: Large tertiary hospital in Milan. Participants: Mechanically ventilated patients with confirmed COVID-19 admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) between 20 February and 2 April 2020. Main outcome measures: Demographic and daily clinical data were collected to identify predictors of early mortality. Results: Of the 73 patients included in the study, most were male (83.6%), the median age was 61 years (interquartile range [IQR], 54-69 years), and hypertension affected 52.9% of patients. Lymphocytopenia (median, 0.77 x 103 per mm3 ;IQR, 0.58-1.00 x 103 per mm3), hyperinflammation with C-reactive protein (median, 184.5 mg/dL;IQR, 108.2-269.1 mg/dL) and pro-coagulant status with D-dimer (median, 10.1 mug/m;IQR, 5.0-23.8 mug/m) were present. Median tidal volume was 6.7 mL/kg (IQR, 6.0-7.5 mL/kg), and median positive end-expiratory pressure was 12 cmH2O (IQR, 10-14 cmH2O). In the first 3 days, prone positioning (12-16 h) was used in 63.8% of patients and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in five patients (6.8%). After a median follow-up of 19.0 days (IQR, 15.0-27.0 days), 17 patients (23.3%) had died, 23 (31.5%) had been discharged from the ICU, and 33 (45.2%) were receiving invasive mechanical ventilation in the ICU. Older age (odds ratio [OR], 1.12;95% CI, 1.04-1.22;P = 0.004) and hypertension (OR, 6.15;95% CI, 1.75-29.11;P = 0.009) were associated with mortality, while early improvement in arterial partial pressure of oxygen (PaO2) to fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2) ratio was associated with being discharged alive from the ICU (P = 0.002 for interaction). Conclusions: Despite multiple advanced critical care interventions, COVID-19 ARDS was associated with prolonged ventilation and high short term mortality. Older age and pre-admission hypertension were key mortality risk factors. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04318366.
ABSTRACT
The clinical picture of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in various target organs has been extensively studied and described. However, relatively little is known about the characteristics of oral cavity involvement. This is surprising, considering that oral mucosal and salivary gland cells are known targets for the direct replication of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) and that the presence of the virus in saliva is a source of transmission of the infection. The aim of our study was to investigate the presence and prevalence of oral manifestations in COVID-19 survivors. We profiled the oral involvement in 122 COVID-19 survivors that were hospitalized and followed up at a single-referral university hospital in Milan, Italy, between July 23, 2020 and September 7, 2020, after a median (interquartile range) time from hospital discharge of 104 (95 to 132) d. We found that oral manifestations, specifically salivary gland ectasia, were unexpectedly common, with oral manifestations being detected in 83.9% while salivary gland ectasia in 43% of COVID-19 survivors. Salivary gland ectasia reflected the hyperinflammatory response to SARS-CoV-2, as demonstrated by the significant relationship with C-reactive protein (CRP) and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) levels at hospital admission, and with the use of antibiotics during acute disease. Both LDH levels and antibiotic administration survived as independent predictors of salivary gland ectasia at multivariable analysis. Temporomandibular joint abnormalities, facial pain, and masticatory muscle weakness were also common. Overall, this retrospective and prospective cohort study of COVID-19 survivors revealed that residual damage of the oral cavity persists in the vast majority of patients far beyond clinical recovery, and suggests that the oral cavity represents a preferential target for SARS-CoV-2 infection. Further studies are needed to clarify the connection between SARS-CoV-2 infection and oral disorders.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Dilatation, Pathologic , Humans , Italy , Prospective Studies , Retrospective Studies , SARS-CoV-2 , Salivary GlandsABSTRACT
At the end of 2019, the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) outbreak spread from China all around the world, causing thousands of deaths. In Italy, the hardest hit region was Lombardy, with the first reported case on 20 February 2020. San Raffaele Scientific Institute - a large tertiary hospital and research centre in Milan, Italy - was immediately involved in the management of the public health emergency. Since the beginning of the outbreak, the elective surgical activity of the hospital was rapidly reduced and large areas of the hospital were simultaneously reorganised to admit and assist patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). In addition, the hospital became the regional referral hub for cardiovascular emergencies in order to keep ensuring a high level of health care to non-COVID-19 patients in northern Italy. In a few days, a COVID-19 emergency department was created, improving the general ward capacity to a total number of 279 beds dedicated to patients with COVID-19. Moreover, the number of intensive care unit (ICU) beds was increased from 28 to 72 (54 of them dedicated to patients with COVID-19, and 18 to cardiology and cardiac surgery hub emergencies), both converting pre-existing areas and creating new high technology spaces. All the involved health care personnel were rapidly trained to use personal protection equipment and to manage this particular category of patients both in general wards and ICUs. Furthermore, besides clinical activities, continuously important research projects were carried out in order to find new strategies and more effective therapies to better face an unprecedented health emergency in Italy.
ABSTRACT
Objective: Describe characteristics, daily care and outcomes of patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Design: Case series of 73 patients. Setting: Large tertiary hospital in Milan. Participants: Mechanically ventilated patients with confirmed COVID-19 admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) between 20 February and 2 April 2020. Main outcome measures: Demographic and daily clinical data were collected to identify predictors of early mortality. Results: Of the 73 patients included in the study, most were male (83.6%), the median age was 61 years (interquartile range [IQR], 54-69 years), and hypertension affected 52.9% of patients. Lymphocytopenia (median, 0.77 x 10(3) per mm(3);IQR, 0.58-1.00 x 10(3) per mm(3)), hyperinflammation with C-reactive protein (median, 184.5 mg/dL;IQR, 108.2-269.1 mg/dL) and pro-coagulant status with D-dimer (median, 10.1 mu g/m;IQR, 5.0-23.8 mu g/m) were present. Median tidal volume was 6.7 mUkg (IQR, 6.0-7.5 mL/kg), and median positive end-expiratory pressure was 12 cmH(2)O (IQR, 10-14 cmH(2)O). In the first 3 days, prone positioning (12-16 h) was used in 63.8% of patients and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in five patients (6.8%). After a median followup of 19.0 days (IQR, 15.0-27.0 days), 17 patients (23.3%) had died, 23 (31.5%) had been discharged from the ICU, and 33 (45.2%) were receiving invasive mechanical ventilation in the ICU. Older age (odds ratio [OR], 1.12;95% CI, 1.04-1.22;P= 0.004) and hypertension (OR, 6.15;95% CI, 1.75-29.11;P = 0.009) were associated with mortality, while early improvement in arterial partial pressure of oxygen (Pao(2) ) to fraction of inspired oxygen (Fio(2)) ratio was associated with being discharged alive from the ICU (P = 0.002 for interaction). Conclusions: Despite multiple advanced critical care interventions, COVID-19 ARDS was associated with prolonged ventilation and high short term mortality. Older age and pre-admission hypertension were key mortality risk factors.
ABSTRACT
We suggest the use of MicroCLOTS (microvascular COVID-19 lung vessels obstructive thromboinflammatory syndrome) as a new name for severe pulmonary coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). We hypothesise that, in predisposed individuals, alveolar viral damage is followed by an inflammatory reaction and by microvascular pulmonary thrombosis. This progressive endothelial thromboinflammatory syndrome may also involve the microvascular bed of the brain and other vital organs, leading to multiple organ failure and death. Future steps in the understanding of the disease and in the identification of treatments may benefit from this definition and hypothesised sequence of events.
ABSTRACT
The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of early treatment with corticosteroids on SARS-CoV-2 clearance in hospitalized COVID-19 patients. Retrospective analysis on patients admitted to the San Raffaele Hospital (Milan, Italy) with moderate/severe COVID-19 and availability of at least two nasopharyngeal swabs. The primary outcome was the time to nasopharyngeal swab negativization. A multivariable Cox model was fitted to determine factors associated with nasopharyngeal swab negativization. Of 280 patients included, 59 (21.1%) patients were treated with steroids. Differences observed between steroid users and non-users included the proportion of patients with a baseline PaO2/FiO2 ≤ 200 mmHg (45.8% vs 34.4% in steroids and non-steroids users, respectively; p = 0.023) or ≤ 100 mmHg (16.9% vs 12.7%; p = 0.027), and length of hospitalization (20 vs 14 days; p < 0.001). Time to negativization of nasopharyngeal swabs was similar in steroid and non-steroid users (p = 0.985). According to multivariate analysis, SARS-CoV-2 clearance was associated with age ≤ 70 years, a shorter duration of symptoms at admission, a baseline PaO2/FiO2 > 200 mmHg, and a lymphocyte count at admission > 1.0 × 109/L. SARS-CoV-2 clearance was not associated with corticosteroid use. Our study shows that delayed SARS-CoV-2 clearance in moderate/severe COVID-19 is associated with older age and a more severe disease, but not with an early use of corticosteroids.
Subject(s)
Adrenal Cortex Hormones/therapeutic use , COVID-19 Drug Treatment , Viral Load/drug effects , Age Factors , Aged , COVID-19/epidemiology , Female , Hospitalization , Humans , Italy/epidemiology , Male , Middle Aged , Pandemics , Retrospective Studies , Time Factors , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
Background:Patients with severe COVID-19 pneumonia and hyperinflammation face increased mortality. There is an urgent need for effective treatments to reduce the burden of the COVID-19 pandemic.Objectives:Our protocol aimed at evaluating the potential improvement in clinical outcomes with mavrilimumab, an anti-Granulocyte/Macrophage Colony-Stimulating Factor Receptor alpha (GM-CSFRα) monoclonal antibody, in patients with COVID-19 pneumonia and systemic hyper-inflammation.Methods:Single-center, open-label, single active arm intervention;Adult patients with severe COVID-19 pneumonia (as evaluated by CT scanning), hypoxia (PaO2:FiO2 ratio ≤ 300 mmHg), and systemic hyper-inflammation (increased C-reactive protein [CRP] ≥ 100 mg/mL and/or ferritin ≥ 900 μg/L, increased lactate dehydrogenase [LDH]) received a single intravenous dose of mavrilimumab added to standard of care;follow-up 28 days. Main outcomes measure was time to clinical improvement (reduction ≥ 2 categories on the 7-point WHO clinical status scale, 1=discharge, 7=death);others included time to discharge from hospital;% of pts achieving a clinical improvement;survival;mechanical-ventilation free survival;time to fever resolution;CRP;PaO2:FiO2 ratio.Results:A mavrilimumab group (n=13 COVID-19 patients, non-mechanically ventilated, median age 57 [IQR, 52-58], males 12 [92%], febrile 11 [85%];PaO2:FiO2 195.5[166.7–215.0]) was compared to a cohort of 26 contemporaneous patients with similar baseline characteristics. Death occurred in 0% (n=0/13) of mavrilimumab recipients and 27% (n=7/26) of comparison-group patients (log rank p=0.046) during the 28-day follow-up. 100% (n=13) of mavrilimumab recipients and 65% (n=17) of comparison-group patients achieved clinical improvement (p=0.018) at Day 28, with earlier improvement (median 8.0 [IQR, 5.0–11.0] days vs 18.5 [11.0–NE] days) (p0.001) in mavrilimumab recipients. Fever had resolved in 91% (n=10/11 febrile patients) of mavrilimumab recipients by Day 14, compared to 61% (n=11/18 febrile) of patients in the comparison group (p=0.110);fever resolution was faster in mavrilimumab recipients versus controls (median 1.0 [IQR, 1.0–2.0] day vs 7.0 [3.0 - NE] days, respectively, p=0·009). Mavrilimumab was well tolerated in all patients.Conclusion:Patients with severe COVID-19 pneumonia and systemic hyper-inflammation who received treatment with mavrilimumab had better clinical outcomes compared to patients receiving routine care. Mavrilimumab was well-tolerated. Randomized controlled trials are warranted to confirm our findings.References:[1]Zhou F, Yu T, Du R, et al. Clinical course and risk factors for mortality of adult inpatients with COVID-19 in Wuhan, China: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet 2020;395:1054-62[2]Mehta P, McAuley DF, Brown M, et al. HLH Across Speciality Collaboration, UK. COVID-19: consider cytokine storm syndromes and immunosuppression. Lancet. 2020;395:1033-4Disclosure of Interests:Giacomo De Luca Speakers bureau: SOBI, Novartis, Celgene, Pfizer, MSD, Giulio Cavalli Speakers bureau: SOBI, Novartis, Pfizer, Corrado Campochiaro Speakers bureau: Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, GSK, SOBI, Emanuel Della Torre: None declared, Piera Angelillo: None declared, Alessandro Tomelleri: None declared, nicola boffini: None declared, Stefano Tentori: None declared, Francesca Mette: None declared, Patrizia Rovere-Querini: None declared, Annalisa Ruggeri: None declared, Teresa D’Aliberti: None declared, Paolo Scarpelllini: None declared, Giovanni Landoni: None declared, Francesco De Cobelli: None declared, John F. Paolini Shareholder of: Kiniksa, Employee of: Kiniksa, Alberto Zangrillo: None declared, Moreno Tresoldi: None declared, Bruce C. Trapnell Consultant of: Kiniksa, Fabio Ciceri: None declared, Lorenzo Dagna Grant/research support from: Abbvie, BMS, Celgene, Janssen, MSD, Mundipharma Pharmaceuticals, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, SG, SOBI, Consultant of: Abbvie, Amgen, Biogen, BMS, Celltrion, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, SG, and SOBI